SECURITY & COMPLIANCE

Security posture and compliance strategy

Security requirements vary by buyer segment. This page separates current operating status from potential compliance paths so buyers and internal teams can make decisions from factual ground.

Current Status (April 27, 2026)

SOC 2 Attestation

Not currently active/published

A SOC report is not currently presented on this site.

Questionnaire Support

Available during sales process

Structured procurement responses can be prepared per opportunity (CAIQ/SIG style where required).

Deployment Model

Project-scoped

Cloud and local/on-prem deployment patterns can be scoped to buyer security requirements.

Public Trust Artifacts

Limited public publication

Detailed evidence packages are handled directly during security review and commercial discussions.

Practical Compliance Options

PATH OPTION

Option A: Focus on non-SOC2-gated customers

Prioritize fast-close buyers who accept strong security controls and review evidence without requiring immediate SOC 2 attestation.

Best when speed and near-term revenue are higher priority than enterprise procurement access.

PATH OPTION

Option B: Bridge with security package + questionnaires

Use a structured security package (architecture, controls summary, questionnaire responses) to satisfy buyers that do not require immediate formal attestation.

Best when many deals need assurance depth but can tolerate staged compliance.

PATH OPTION

Option C: Start staged SOC 2 pathway

Invest in scoped controls and audit preparation, then execute formal attestation milestones for enterprise-heavy pipeline segments.

Best when strategic pipeline is repeatedly blocked by SOC 2 requirements.

FAST-CLOSE LANE

Buyers without immediate SOC 2 gate

Use controlled architecture, questionnaire responses, and explicit security scope in contract language to move quickly while maintaining credibility.

Recommended when close speed is the primary constraint.

ENTERPRISE LANE

Buyers with mandatory SOC 2 procurement

Treat these as planned compliance investments. Set expectation on audit path, timing, and commercial checkpoints before heavy pre-sales effort.

Recommended only when account value justifies compliance overhead.

Buyer Qualification Checklist

Use these gates in discovery before solution design, proposal effort, or security review deep-dives.

Is SOC 2 Type 2 mandatory before contract signature?

IF YES

Route to enterprise lane. Set timeline expectations early.

IF NO

Proceed with standard security review package and technical scoping.

Will a Type 1 report plus roadmap satisfy procurement for phase one?

IF YES

Use staged compliance path with clear delivery dates.

IF NO

Either defer deal or scope a non-production pilot only.

Do they accept questionnaire + evidence pack as interim assurance?

IF YES

Proceed with CAIQ/SIG style responses and controls walkthrough.

IF NO

Treat as SOC-locked account and price in compliance effort.

Is this account strategic enough to justify compliance spend?

IF YES

Prioritize and include compliance cost in go-to-market plan.

IF NO

Disqualify early and keep focus on faster-close segments.

Claims are limited to controls and attestations currently in force. Questionnaire and architecture evidence can support review, but they are not a replacement for an independent SOC report.

Need a security-first engagement plan?

Start with a Systems Audit. We can define technical scope, risk boundaries, and the right compliance lane before committing to build effort.